Return of the Living Dead Book Needs Your Help
4 new posts | 4 total posts
4 new posts | 4 total posts
Lost Boys 3 Finds Its Leading Hottie
4 new posts | 4 total posts
4 new posts | 4 total posts
The Making of The Wolfman Featurette
3 new posts | 3 total posts
3 new posts | 3 total posts
The Twilight Saga: New Moon
2 new posts | 2 total posts
2 new posts | 2 total posts
More Hints at Valentine in Resident Evil: Afterlife
2 new posts | 9 total posts
2 new posts | 9 total posts
The Haunting in Connecticut
1 new posts | 30 total posts
1 new posts | 30 total posts
Comments
Posted by: Dan on February 1, 2009 at 09:05:34
Awesome, about time we got something original out in the theateres today
Posted by: moviewizguy on February 1, 2009 at 10:11:43
Those...sound...very...original. God, and Hollywood makes them sound very hard to do.
Posted by: soot on February 1, 2009 at 14:44:07
"Original?" Same crap different paper bag...
Posted by: Caterpillar on February 1, 2009 at 15:39:31
PATHFINDER was an "original" and that sucked worse than most remakes. Nispel has some neat ideas, for example he keeps bringing up how much he loves Joel Peter Witkin's photographs and wants to make a film in that style but so far he hasn't delivered anything remotely that artistic. At least he doesn't shy away from the red stuff, eh? Speaking of which, Herr Nispel, where's my uncut TCM (2003)?
Posted by: ico on February 1, 2009 at 15:41:22
They both sound interesting but i think his style would work more with the "Pod" one.
Posted by: sp on February 1, 2009 at 21:21:27
His PATHFINDER was NOT original. It was a remake of a 1987 Norwegian film
Posted by: ElevenxEleven on February 2, 2009 at 04:12:10
"Immaculate Conception" Does not sound original. It sounds like a movie ripped off from many others. Blessed, being one of them (Heather Graham), which was pretty much the same concept.
Posted by: Winchester on February 2, 2009 at 04:15:04
Oh my God, you guys really are pathetic. NOTHING sounds original. Of course, everything is borrowed from something. What Nispel is talking about are things that are not remakes or sequels. You guys will find anything to ***** about, remakes or original scripts - you're damned if you do, damned if you don't.
Posted by: joe on February 2, 2009 at 07:12:59
what happened to his Turn movie` remake for paraount ictures
Posted by: stu on February 2, 2009 at 09:44:08
these sound far too original...Hollywood'nt will never let them see the light of day.....
Posted by: Mikey on February 2, 2009 at 10:55:34
It seems again that people don't understand what Immaculate Conception refers to. Regardless, it sounds a little interesting, especially if it's more similar in tone to something like Coma.
Posted by: moviewizguy on February 2, 2009 at 19:03:45
Uh, yes, I said "original." Am I wrong for thinking such things? Compared to the sequels/prequels, superhero movies, adaptations, remakes, and spoof movies out there, I will very well darn think these must be some of the most original concepts I've ever heard of so don't mock me!
"The Dark Knight" is a superhero movie, "Curious Case" was based on a short story, "Milk" was based on a man's life, "Doubt" was based on a play, "Revolutionary Road" and "The Reader" both are based on even more books, "The Wrestler" is based on another book, "Slumdog Millionaire" is based on another book, "Twilight" is based on a best selling book. Do you want me to go on? I think I've made my point.
1
Add a comment