ShockTillYouDrop.com

Posted by: Joe on January 24, 2009 at 18:54:43

She's so hot now.

Posted by: Rudy M. on January 24, 2009 at 19:42:19

Hopefully she's gets the role for the sequel of Twilight because she's a great actress & I love the twilight saga. Also, she's hot & fine too.
I Love You!
To:
Dakota Fanning


P.S. I'm going to see that movie that she stars called "Push".
In Theaters Feb. 6

Posted by: noob on January 24, 2009 at 22:16:09

omg you guys are sick. Dakota fanning is like 3 years old. what a bunch of pervs!! of course the last movie i watched with her in it was uptown girl with her and Britney spears lol

Posted by: Doug on January 24, 2009 at 23:46:29

Party of me wants to google her, and find out how old she is now, but part of me is worried... did Obama retract the patriot act yet??

Posted by: Emma on January 25, 2009 at 05:30:59

i love twilight i have read all four books and thought there were great,i really want to go to an audition for it if any1 nows anything contact me.

Posted by: Matt on January 25, 2009 at 20:59:26

hey noob, Dakota is 14 yrs old and she will turn 15 next month February 23. so learn to read ya tool.

Posted by: S on January 26, 2009 at 02:58:45

shed be a good jane, i guess :)

Posted by: Cheryl on January 26, 2009 at 12:46:52

Bit worried about what she'd cost.is she worth it?

Posted by: Dave Jordon on January 26, 2009 at 14:13:56

What the heck is going on, although Dakota Fanning is turning 15 she still looks like a little kid by comparison to the other actors, she would look like a thin slice of pizza. she would though make a good little sister.

Posted by: Dave Jordon on January 26, 2009 at 14:16:35

A good vampire would probably be Kirsten Dunst, her first acting gig was playing a vampire and was very convincing.

Posted by: Sienna on January 26, 2009 at 16:54:41

OMFG, she'd make the worst jane ever, and that's the only charcter I can think of her acting as. She just wouldn't look or act the part. And her eyes bug out so weird...I ****ing hate her

Posted by: Matt on January 26, 2009 at 17:09:39

Dave Jordon, Kirsten Dunst is too old to do another vampire because she already done it when she was a little girl from old vampire movie "interview with the vampire" with Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise. Have you ever seen that one?

Sienna, you are wrong.

Posted by: Terri on January 27, 2009 at 16:41:08

I personally don't think she is right for the part of Jane, Jane is a serious vampire with a serious scare factor and I don't think Dakota has that, i think she might be good for the part of Leah Clearwater, but i heard a rumor that they were trying to get Vanessa Hugens to play that role, which would totally make the movie suck, and its a shame b/c i am a huge fan, but putting Vanessa in it, is like saying lets get all the 7 year old high school musical fans to watch this movie too!! Big bunch of crap!

Posted by: mimi on January 28, 2009 at 09:06:37

I love that she could be jane! great!

Posted by: Ulysses on January 30, 2009 at 19:20:12

Twilight was not the greatest movie, and Dakota Fanning might not be the best Vampire. But Directors and Make-up Artists do amazing work, sometimes. We'll see. I hope the second movie is better than the first. Out of 1 thru 10, I gave Twilight a 6, 10 being the tops.

Posted by: tash on March 9, 2009 at 04:58:29

yes she will do the part verry well

Posted by: jordan jones on May 27, 2009 at 21:32:15

i think i sould get the part becaues i already met rob and jane is not the part for dakota beacaues she is more of a jumpy person and jane is straight up like me an i always wanted to be an ACTRESS an it saddins me to everyone eles being and ACTRESS an not MEEEEEEEEEEEE but dont get me worg she is cool when i met an a good actor so cudos