
When the undead rear their dusty, beef jerky'd bodies to spearhead an effort to take over the world, you call the O'Connell family. As a matter of fact, don't bother. They'll somehow, inevitably, find their way into some form of high adventure with guns a-blazin' and a rampaging mummy or two, whether they mean to or not. Two very popular films have taught us that. The first, Stephen Sommers' rewriting of
Mummy history in Universal's 1999 blockbuster hit; then in 2001's manic, CGI-festooned
The Mummy Returns which found Rick and Evelyn O'Connell (Brendan Fraser and Rachel Weisz, respectively) strapped with Egypt-trotting spawn of their own, Alex, to aid them in their defense against a mummy who wouldn't stay down.
Seven years later, Imhotep's ancient news.
Universal now welcomes a new director and a, for lack of a better word,
fresh mummy menace in
The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor. Fraser is back but his loved ones have changed appearances this time.
A History of Violence's Maria Bello now plays Evelyn and Luke Ford is Alex O'Connell - older and carrying on his own career as an archeologist. And lest we forget John Hannah reprising his role as Jonathan, Evelyn's often-sauced brother. They face big trouble in China when the titular Emperor Han (Jet Li) - a tad peeved from being baked alive with his army long, long ago - is resurrected by a General to wreak havoc.
Written by Alfred Gough and Miles Millar, the story uses the real life discovery of a buried terracotta army near Xi'an in 1974 as a leaping off point to establish a new mummy mythology far removed from the sands of Egypt. Against this backdrop of action, horror, monsters and a smattering of kung-fu (provided by Li and co-star Michelle Yeoh), the O'Connells sort out personal and martial issues that come with age ('cause nothing says family time like a mummy attack).
Director Rob Cohen is at Todd-AO Studios today burning the wick at both ends. In his company are sound engineers Gary Summers, Scott Millan, and Daniel Leahy. All are hustling to cram over a month's worth of work into three weeks. On the to-do list: Re-sync and conform select tracks after making adjustments to reel 2 and sweeten the audio. Earlier this afternoon, Cohen was in another part of Santa Monica supervising a few of the overwhelming amount of
The Mummy's CGI effects. He's been moving at a breakneck speed since shooting began on the third chapter in July of 2007. Yet Cohen's endurance shows no signs of wear; his nature is positive and when he's asked by his assistant what change of clothes he should have set aside for Cohen, the director responds with an easy,
"Jeans and a t-shirt." Casual is one way to describe this director sitting before us in ripped jeans and a stack of Buddhist mala beads on his right wrist.
During ShockTillYouDrop.com's visit to the studio, Cohen shows us a few select scenes which includes Rick and Evelyn being pulled out of retirement for one last mission (promising possible danger - this, of course, peaks the couple's interest), Alex discovering the tomb of Emperor Han (booby-traps galore, lotsa dead guys and the introduction of the very stunning Isabella Leong) and a skirmish at "Imhotep's," a Shanghai nightclub owned by Jonathan, naturally. How does it all look? Well, it's definitely
Mummy business as usual with the mixture of action and laughs. A few things Cohen and company has done right is making Alex older; he's got his father's instinct and charisma (his skirt-chasing skills are lacking, as we see) - a fitting successor to carry on future films, if called upon to do so. A new setting appears to be a sure-fire way to revitalize the franchise as well.
Shock talks to Cohen in-depth about the making of the film, the intentions he set out to uphold and why a certain cast member chose not to return.
ShockTillYouDrop.com: This is a fully aware Mummy film it looks like. Evelyn has written two books, The Mummy and The Mummy Returns, you've got the Imhotep nightclub...
Rob Cohen: You have to be. You have to know the filmmaker knows what kind of movie he is making and what his audience is. We have just enough of a wink at the past so we can launch into the future in a whole different tone which this movie does do.
Shock: You're also facing quite a challenge because not only do you need to meet certain expectations with a third chapter, but you're starting from scratch by dispensing with the Imhotep mythology. Essentially, you're putting your own mark on it now.
Cohen: When they sent me the script, I had lived in China in my past when I did
Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story, I have a home in Indonesia, I'm through Asia all of the time. I'm a practicing Buddhist. I just have a love for all of this. And I said to them, if you want a treatment of China where the Chinese are kind of funny, I'm not you're guy. I'm going to do a movie that follows a true love of Chinese culture. So, Stephen Sommers, Sean Daniel and Jim Jacks - the producers - wanted me to make my movie. The studio was 100% supportive of that. A reporter recently said to me that the new
Indiana Jones film went toward the direction of the
Mummy franchise. That's funny, because I've gone more towards the direction of
Indiana Jones.
Shock: Many films of this ilk that have a worldly scope tend to rely on creating digital environments - what real-to-CG ratio would you say you have in this film? Did you shoot mostly on location/set?
Cohen: 100% sets. There are no green screen sets in this movie. I went all over China - the deserts of Beijing. [The scene you're watching] is a 300-year-old Ming opera house that the red guards tried to destroy. There are these beautiful murals in there. They painted the thing white and one of the things I loved [about this location] is the murals are bleeding through the white, they're coming back from the defacement.
Shock: Was it hard to sell the studio on going to China? Did they ever say you could just do this in Burbank?
Cohen: The truth is, I had a list of ten commandments when I went in for the first meeting. One of them was that we were going to shoot all location stuff in China. We went to Western China near the Kazakhstan border then down to Hengdian then we wound up at the Shanghai studios where we had a basic standing set of The Bund, then we expanded it for this chase featuring a chariot drawn by four bronze horses.
Shock: What were your other commandments?
Cohen: The respect for the historical context. Jet Li was a big one. All I wanted back was Brendan [Fraser] and John [Hannah]. If Rachel [Weisz] came back it was all right, but if she didn't come back it was all right. There would be no bad cultural jokes goofing on the Chinese or the Chinese culture - which was in the script when I got it. I was going to do a battle sequence in the end that wasn't in the script in which it would be Jet Li bringing the terracotta army back to life, but still terracotta. Michelle Yeoh and Maria [Bello] would bring back all of the people who died in the foundation building the Great Wall of China. 'Cause this Emperor started the great Northern Wall project and anyone who was his enemy, or any conquered soldier...they were worked to death building the wall. They found [the remnants of] a guy who was a lawyer of the time, they found him with the scrolls of 27 volumes of legal cases of the time and the punishment for almost anything - other than being cut in half, or beheaded, or drawn and quartered...it just said "wall."
Shock: Where is O'Connell family at this stage in their lives when this film picks up?
Cohen: Alex is now 21. Rick and Evie have retired and they're just bored out of their minds. They've got no juice between them. They hardly have anything to say. He's trying to learn how to fly fish, she's a novelist who's written about the two experiences she's had and doesn't know where to go with a third one. They're dried up until the foreign office gives them an assignment to courier back a precious Chinese artifact back to Shanghai. They don't know that they're son is in China and they don't know that he's found the tomb until they get there. At that point, instead of embracing him, they're mad at him that he dropped out of college, they're treating him like he's ten and he fights back. You've got Luke Ford versus Brendan in a contest of wills that every father and every son knows. That goes on through the whole film. The rekindling of the Rick/Evie romance and the final acknowledgement of son to father and father to son is really a big part of the movie. There's a really nice family dynamic within the big story.
Shock: Indiana Jones recently introduced his son - how is the play between Brendan and Luke going to be different than the Jones family?
Cohen: First of all, the son is not a caricature. [Alex is] a real identifiable kid who found a diary in the stacks and got [his expedition] financed and found the tomb. Steven was making a very extreme character out of Shia [LaBeouf]. Whenever you bring someone in on a Harley doing Marlon Brando, you're not taking off on this level. I think the
rapprochement here is totally emotional. It's a very different intent. It's ironic because I did see [
Kingdom of the Crystal Skull] and there are similarities. But we didn't know what they were doing at the time. I think you'll see our treatment is different in tone and casting. Luke is 6-foot-3, an inch and a half taller than Brendan. And Brendan is great in this, because he's anchored with real stuff, his humor is so much funnier. Because when he does be funny, he's genuinely funny. He can be exasperating and frustrated.
Shock: On the flipside, this film has a large menagerie of monsters: The dragon, the Yeti, the Foo dogs - were these some of your concoctions or were they originally introduced in the script?
Cohen: The Yeti was in the script. The three-headed dragon was not, nor was the Foo dog, but I had been developing
Sinbad with Keanu Reeves and I had become interested in the character that was going to be Jet - the villain in that was going to be a shape-shifter. So, I put it in here. Once he reaches the pool of eternal life at Shangri-La, he could now change form when he needed to. When he gets back to raise the army, he turns himself into a three-headed dragon so he could fly out of the Himalayas, not hike. Then he turns himself into the temple guardian dogs and can just cross the battlefield. You get the opportunity in a movie like this that you can't do in
Indiana Jones because in
Jones when it got more slapstick, it still had to be in the world. This is a magical world and when you start talking about the undead, you may as well go all the way. Take your opportunities and make it something unforgettable.
Shock: How did you take to the visual effects workload you laid out for yourself?
Cohen: My first effects film was
Dragonheart. In those days there was no Pixar, but to do a photo-real creature that spoke and had the personality of Sean Connery in 1994 was a big leap. ILM and I really conquered it, I think.
Daylight had a lot of effects. Then I put a lot of effects in
Fast and Furious in a more limited type,
XXX had it with an avalanche sequence.
Stealth was a major effects movie, then this one is the most major thing that I've done. This is has 1,000 visual effect with the most complicated 3-D work that you could possibly do. We had to write all new algorithms for the liquid solids, as I called them, to make the terracotta to move and not make it look like latex. It was a challenge.
Shock: Where has Stephen Sommers been in all of this? He's a producer and you mentioned he gave you creative freedom, but has he popped in to check up on your progress?
Cohen: I've seen Sommers four times in a year in a half. I saw him in the first meeting, at the table read in Montreal where he heard the actors, I saw him when I finished my cut and I saw him last week.
Shock: Sounds like a definite passing of the torch then.
Cohen: It's the right thing to do because trying to wrangle a guy like me is not the right thing to do. But he had the respect from one director to another. He's a really good guy and he realizes, "I'm giving it to you, because I could've done it but I'm doing something else now. So I'm going to trust you." Not many guys could do that. I've watched all of my franchises trashed out of existence by guys like Neal Moritz, the producer. It hurts. It hurts when you see something like
Fast and the Furious or
XXX and you see what they do. It's very disappointing.
Shock: Of the existing Mummy films, everyone has their favorites...
Cohen: I like the first. Because, in one, I felt something very genuine evolving. I felt it was fresh, that there was imagery in there that was unforgettable, it was having a good time with it but it carried a certain discipline. I felt the second one became a lot of overkill. It wasn't as successful, but it was more financially successful. The studio did a lot of research about the fans and the audiences - the thing they found was most were in favor of number one, but what they remembered was: Brendan Fraser, great visual effects, and a sense of fun. I took that to heart. Although my sense of humor is different than Stephen's, this movie is an enjoyable movie to participate in. It's a fun ride.
Shock: Do you see yourself doing another Mummy, returning to this mythology?
Cohen: I don't know about this mythology, but I had such a good time with this cast, Brendan and Jet, I would bring Jet back in 1950 as another guy. As a hero this time, with Brendan. And I've got an idea of where it could take place and what it could do, but it's overstepping, because it's not my franchise and this hasn't been a hit. At this budget, it has to be a big hit.
Shock: Having said that, how much pressure are you feeling then?
Cohen: A lot. I'm proud that I have never gone over budget, I brought this in a million and a half under budget after principal photography considering we shot on two continents and all of the things that could have gone wrong up in the desert. We moved that company around with tremendous efficiency. I wanted to come through for the studio because the [budget] number was large and I'm the one who fought for it. They gave me $30 million more than they said they would when I signed on. But it came in increments. It went up gently, but you have to be loyal and responsible to a studio that has stretched itself to make this work. My argument was the
Mummy that this cost is a whole lot better than the investment where they started. The wonder and the scale we were ultimately able to achieve is so much more commercial than what they were going to do in the beginning.
Shock: Can you talk about Maria stepping into the role of Evelyn?
Cohen: I finished three drafts of the script very quickly with [Alfred] Gough and [Miles] Millar, the writers and we sent the script off to Brendan and Rachel. I went to Westport and met with him. He and I had an immediate bond. I got a call from Rachel's agent who said, "She's not playing the mother of a 21-year-old and she's not going to China." And I said, "Okay, well I guess she's not doing the movie." I told the studio I'm not changing the design of movie. This is a young bull, old bull conflict and Alex is in every major action scene playing a major part. I don't want to a 16-year-old kid with a gun in his hand, it's going to look ridiculous. The studio stuck by me and when they asked me who I saw as Evelyn I opened it up to American actresses because I think it's easier to learn an accent. I've always admired Maria for her ballsiness. I sent the script to her agent and [made an offer]. I got a call, she wanted to meet and we had a drink. I asked her why she was interested in this. She said, "I'll tell you, when I saw
Indiana Jones, the first one, all of my girlfriends wanted to be Karen Allen, but I wanted to be Harrison Ford." I said, you're so going to screen test. She took a few weeks to get her English accent going, I made her a brunette, screen tested her with Brendan and when he saw it, he said, "It would be an honor to work with her."
Shock: Was there any thought to writing Evelyn out?
Cohen: I played with it. I played with a new wife. The truth is, this is a marriage 13 years after the other movie - and the chronology of the movie is correct. The first movie was 1925, the second movie was 1933 and this is 1946. But there is such a huge difference once you become parents. It's no longer about how hot you are for each other. [For these two] life has set in. You've had some tough experiences, you've lived through World War II, you've parked your kid in Australia. You suddenly wake up and realize you hardly know your son and each other anymore. That was a perfect door for a new actress to come into. Because the woman you married is not the same woman 20 years later. She's matured and grown and she's seen who you are. The casting of a 40-year-old actress with a 41-year-old actor...the possibilities of a mature relationship were redolent and we were able to do it. Although the audience may be shocked, as they movie goes on they'll be happy. Maria is so strong and kick-ass. I've got her doing a martial arts fight in an evening gown. She does swords, guns...she's mean with a Winchester. She's just a lot of fun to watch. There's intelligence to her.
Shock: You mentioned working on the script with Gough and Millar. Can you elaborate on that? Are you a director who gets behind the keyboard and gets in there to make changes or do you provide notes?
Cohen: No, I did three drafts with them and then I said to them, "Look, I've got to write the action now. It's too exhausting putting it there and I think through the fingertips, so is that cool with you?" I'm not asking for credit or pay, these guys are really talented and they're the loveliest people in the world. I had a meeting with them and I told them to look me in the eyes and tell me they're behind everything I want to do. They said they were totally down for it. They worked on the film all the way through. We threw stuff back and forth, because we had no time to play games and they rose to the occasion.
Shock: The scenes you've shown us delicately play with the frights and action you expect from these movies - has that been an easy balance for you?
Cohen: Yeah, it's a juggling act. You don't want to have too much without knowing who the people are, you don't want to bog down character stuff to the point where the audience is going, "Move on!" It's a balance of humor and jeopardy. When they're in jeopardy, they're in real jeopardy, there's nothing for a joke.
The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor opens in theaters from Universal on August 1st.
Comments
Posted by: Jake on July 7, 2008 at 03:34:31
This movie's gonna be hawt.
Posted by: soot on July 7, 2008 at 04:00:09
I'm not expecting something great, but it would be a nice surprise. All I want is a good/fun movie, and it better be at least that.
Posted by: ZooOfAllEvilCreatures on July 7, 2008 at 04:04:00
Wow... he aired out Neal H. Moritz.
Didn't see that one comin'.
Posted by: ShadowMan on July 7, 2008 at 05:12:32
It hurts Rob Cohen to see all his franchises trashed? That's funny, it hurts us film goers to see any of his trash films!
Also, real, proper film makers set out to make films, not franchises. Sequels should be something that happen organically as an after-effect of a successful film, where the story and film's financial success warrants it. The only people who are looking to create a new franchise right from the get go, rather than make a good film and see where that goes, are egotistical money grubbing hacks. So people like Rob Cohen basically.
xXx, The Skulls, Stealth, Scandalous, The Rat Pack...all absolutely horrible films. And Dragonheart, The Fast & The Furious & Daylight weren't much better. The telemovie-like Dragon was okay, if extremely lightweight and inaccurate, but man, this guy makes Brett Ratner look like David Lean.
Can he makes Mummy 3 better than the horrid Mummy 2? Possibly. But that's like saying is green crap better than brown crap. It's all still crap. And pretty much everything Cohen touches turns to crap.
Maybe the film will surprise me and actually be enjoyable after all, but with Cohen in control I wouldn't bet money on it.
Posted by: soforizo on July 7, 2008 at 06:46:00
Great! Looks promising!
Posted by: chad06 on July 7, 2008 at 10:15:36
from what i saw from the trailer, cohen took a very different tone on this one, which i think its disappointing. I mean it might turn out to be great, but i doubt it will feel like a real trilogy since it looks very different from the previous 2 mummies. And the mummies in this one look like stones, whats up with that? i think it will be a fun movie, but somehow were all gona be disappointed...just wait and see
Posted by: Michael on July 7, 2008 at 13:41:05
ShadowMan pretty much said it all.
I don't for a second believe that Rachel Weisz passed on the script because she would have to play the mother of a 21-year-old and would have to go to China to shoot it. Didn't she go to Africa to shoot THE CONSTANT GARDERNER? No, she passed because she's won an Academy Award and doesn't want to be associated with this rubbish.
As for Rob Cohen... has everyone just forgotten about STEALTH?
I'm not hoping for this film to suck, but until I'm proven wrong I'm going to remain cynical.
Posted by: Fred on July 7, 2008 at 14:04:59
Rachel passed on Mummy 3 because she did not like the script which is reported to be very bad, not because she's playing a mother of a 21-year-old. That was made up by Rob because he has a personal problem with Rachel not doing the film and he wants to bad mouth her to promote Maria Bello, who looks so miscast that its not even funny.
Posted by: Ryan Rotten on July 7, 2008 at 14:10:58
"Didn't she go to Africa to shoot THE CONSTANT GARDERNER? No, she passed because she's won an Academy Award and doesn't want to be associated with this rubbish."
And "Constantine" provided her the dramatic fodder she was seeking to round out her career?
If you read closer, you'll see Cohen spoken to Rachel's agent. It's not uncommon for industry agents and managers to stonewall a director's efforts to get material into their client's hands. Not sure what the truth is, but it's something to consider.
Posted by: Fred on July 7, 2008 at 14:15:58
"If you read closer, you'll see Cohen spoken to Rachel's agent. It's not uncommon for industry agents and managers to stonewall a director's efforts to get material into their client's hands. Not sure what the truth is, but it's something to consider"
That's not what Rob said on his blog months before:
http://www.robcohenthemummy.com/2007/09/up-and-running-1.php
"A few of you have inquired about Rachel Weisz and this deserves a response. Rachel decided to leave the franchise many years ago, after "The Mummy 2" finished shooting. We all had hopes that she would change her mind but I never had the opportunity to meet her or talk to her."
What you are hearing is sour grapes from a director who is trying to get publicity for his film by bashing an actress who left the production because she did not like the script, and having contact with an agent is the same as having contact with the client.
Posted by: Zach on July 7, 2008 at 14:31:38
I'll see this movie because I loved the first two, but my expectations are very low. Stephen Sommers is not a great director, but he knows how to make a movie fun and engaging at the same time. With Rachel Wise not coming back, I'm concerned about how the Evy and Rick dynamic will be altered.
I just hope this film doesn't kill the franchise like I think it will.
Posted by: Fred on July 7, 2008 at 15:01:44
“It's the right thing to do because trying to wrangle a guy like me is not the right thing to do. But he had the respect from one director to another.”
That’s funny because Rob Cohen certainly does not have any respect for Stephen Sommers, who he was bad mouthing in a recent interview:
http://www.flickfilosopher.com/blog/2008/06/mummy_3_director_rob_cohen_sma.html
"For this movie, it was about the history. Let’s just say that Stephen Sommers [director of the first two] didn’t pay as much respect and honor to Egypt as I believe we have to China. There’s a balance between playing fast and loose with a culture for entertainment and giving the culture no credence at all"
Rob's own words.
Posted by: Michael on July 7, 2008 at 15:59:58
Ryan, you're right that just because she won an Academy Award, it doesn't automatically guarantee that she'll make good career choices for the rest of her life (and I actually really liked CONSTANTINE for some inexplicable reason) but I just don't believe Cohen's story for a minute. It makes her sound like an image-conscious diva.
To me it makes much more sense that she read the script for this, which probably had a hefty pay attached to it, then read the script for THE LOVELY BONES (which may also have had a nice payday involved, I'm not sure) and decided to take on the more challenging and intelligent project.
Come to think of it, isn't she playing the mother of THREE children in that film?
I'm just as in the dark as everyone else as to why she passed on the film, but I think Cohen's trying to appease the fans with that response.
Posted by: Gambit on July 7, 2008 at 16:10:03
Seriously go back and watch the first two films and assuming that you have a brain you'll see that Mummy 2 is by far a superior film to Mummy 1. The first film in this franchise was wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too corny. The second film had all the laughs of the first film without reaching camp. In fact Scorpion King had less camp than Mummy 1. I'm not saying it was a better film, because it wasn't, but it certainly had less camp.
Posted by: Fred on July 7, 2008 at 16:10:33
"I just don't believe Cohen's story for a minute. It makes her sound like an image-conscious diva."
Its called Cohen trying to bad mouth her because she did not do the film and trying to pump up Maria Bello in the role. Pure spin control for the backlash that is going to come when the film comes out.
Posted by: Henry Q on July 7, 2008 at 16:23:47
Sometimes it's strange to make a movie yet you feel it is great but it bombs in the box office...
Other times the script is really bad but people watch it...
So, what can we expect from Mummy 3... ANYTHING!!
Posted by: Hollie on July 7, 2008 at 19:02:11
Rachel went to Africa for the other movie because she didn't have a child then, she was able to travel.
She said she was done traveling.
You guys are a bunch of *******s.
This movie is goin' to be great and you guys will see.
Posted by: Sun on July 7, 2008 at 19:08:58
I'm excited to see the sword fight between Michelle Yeoh and Jet Li!
Posted by: frank on July 8, 2008 at 11:38:55
damn this is going to suck!
Posted by: Red on July 8, 2008 at 12:23:41
I don't care if Rob Cohen's a self-proclaimed Buddhist. He's still going to portray Eastern culture through a dirty, Western lens. If he really had any respect for Chinese history/culture, he wouldn't be attached to a bogus movie about the terracotta army coming to life.
Posted by: Dennis O on July 8, 2008 at 15:43:03
Why watch this movie without Rachel? Can't see myself doing it.China....I don't get that either. Flop-O
Posted by: Cibele G. on July 10, 2008 at 01:41:56
Hey folks, why discuss so hard? Just read what Brendan has to say: "Leave the beard-stroking to 'Crash'.You want to be enlightened? Go see "Crash." It's great when films have those long, strokey-beard moments where you absolutely must think about something. But sometimes you just want to be entertained." Go to watch The Mummy 3 and be entertained!
Posted by: Kathleen Kiessling on April 17, 2009 at 10:52:07
The Mummy and The Mummy Returns, The Scorpion King (Great! Stuff) and im not just talking for myself.You really need to bring back Rachel Wise (keep your original cast and continue from the Mummy returns) these were very good movies.That last one with a different person for the wife (it sucked/it really did) if you can't get an original cast member, then play like they are visiting/out of the country(anything!)just don't change charectors/it ruins so much.Kathy, a loyal fan of the original Mummy etc. but truly that last one with the new woman sucked.
1
Add a comment