The Poughkeepsie Tapes
1 new posts | 51 total posts
1 new posts | 51 total posts
Saw 7 (Saw VII)
1 new posts | 75 total posts
1 new posts | 75 total posts
EXCL: Meet the New Editor of Fangoria Magazine
1 new posts | 18 total posts
1 new posts | 18 total posts
Greutert Talks Start of Saw 7 Photography
1 new posts | 3 total posts
1 new posts | 3 total posts
One-on-One With The Wolfman's Joe Johnston
1 new posts | 10 total posts
1 new posts | 10 total posts
The Apparition Pulls in Potter Bully
1 new posts | 3 total posts
1 new posts | 3 total posts
Comments
Posted by: mike on August 26, 2009 at 23:21:58
Cool can't wait till friday=P!!!
Posted by: Dennis on August 27, 2009 at 03:20:46
If you want to see this movie, I'd recommend the 3D version. I saw the 2D and I was bored out of my mind. It was like a DTV version of all the other movies.
Posted by: really? on August 27, 2009 at 14:49:40
Dennis... where did you see it in 2D? Since there's only been one preview, and two press previews (one of which only had ten people) and all of them were in 3D...
Perhaps you're from overseas, where it's been released in several territories. Then perhaps you've seen it in 2D.
Or perhaps you work at Fotokem, or one of the theater chains, and you saw a tech run.
But if not any of those, I'm curious as to how you saw it.
Posted by: moviewizguy on August 27, 2009 at 16:17:17
He's obviously from a different country. It's not rocket science.
Posted by: concerned on August 27, 2009 at 16:29:45
Saw a couple of early reviews that said the 3D ain't great...not sure how i fel on this one...http://tinyurl.com/mgbju9
Posted by: Dennis on August 27, 2009 at 18:07:09
To really?--
I run a movie theatre and we received our prints yesterday. The Digital 3D print had a time lock on it that didn't expire until today, so me and my staff had to watch the 2D version. I think the 3D would have given the movie an extra kick and made it more enjoyable. I was expecting more, since the 2nd Final Destination was really good, but this was the worst one in the series.
Posted by: SexyGeek on August 27, 2009 at 23:26:07
Dennis, your thoughts are appreciated. I've said from the start it would be the 3D gimmick that would carry this one. It's nice to hear that maybe that is true. It's unfortunate of course - I was hoping for something more interesting than a subpar rehash that's only worth watching if it's in 3D. Guess I'll see how I feel after I fork over the ten bucks to see it.
Posted by: brickwall300 on August 28, 2009 at 10:38:59
These movies were great in 1 & 2 but they should have stopped there. 3 and apparently this one are just shells of the original with no new originality brought in. It's the same ol, same ol. I will watch this movie, but I am really not a fan of 3-D since I grew up when it was invented and it wasused up then until I detested it in any movie and because of new technology it has resurfaced and yet again I am digusted with it already. I would love to see something BRAND new and fresh sometime before 2020 if that's possible in hollywood.
Posted by: Ryan on August 28, 2009 at 10:45:21
I'm not sure if 3D will be enough to drum up ticket sales for this; but I was wrong about the others.
I know that Stinson loves it though. http://bit.ly/eLp01
By the way; Time lock!? Awesome!
Posted by: Matt on August 29, 2009 at 13:52:57
Well, brickwall300, the statistics disagree with you, the third was the most popular of the series, it made over 13 million world wide
1
Add a comment