Return of the Living Dead Book Needs Your Help
4 new posts | 4 total posts
4 new posts | 4 total posts
Lost Boys 3 Finds Its Leading Hottie
4 new posts | 4 total posts
4 new posts | 4 total posts
The Making of The Wolfman Featurette
3 new posts | 3 total posts
3 new posts | 3 total posts
The Twilight Saga: New Moon
2 new posts | 2 total posts
2 new posts | 2 total posts
More Hints at Valentine in Resident Evil: Afterlife
2 new posts | 9 total posts
2 new posts | 9 total posts
The Haunting in Connecticut
1 new posts | 30 total posts
1 new posts | 30 total posts
Comments
Posted by: Lee J on November 5, 2008 at 15:01:55
Sweet! Can't wait, lets hope it's as good as the first.
Posted by: MikeV on November 5, 2008 at 15:25:03
yeah i hope it is good as the first one..i got in on blu-ray and really enjoy watching it~ very chillen..
Posted by: man on November 5, 2008 at 15:43:45
Was Stella in Dark Days or is this story going to be made up for the movie? Or wait was she in Return to Barrow?
Posted by: Ruttle on November 5, 2008 at 16:17:34
Nuts to this. Leave it alone and as is. First film was great, no sequel necessary (or wanted).
Posted by: Matthew on November 5, 2008 at 16:43:45
Yeah, Ruttle. You don't want a sequel, so that means that everyone else agrees with you and doesn't want to see such a great story continued. F*** off.
Posted by: KHW on November 5, 2008 at 17:00:17
lol seek revenge lol not going to work
Posted by: peddy on November 5, 2008 at 17:37:35
I sorta wish they'd skip "Dark Days" as a sequel, considering how many books there are to choose from. With the way the vampires were done in the movie, not alot of the parts of "Dark Days" will work well. Like the very opening sequence in the convention hall, for instance.
"Return To Barrow" is not only a better story, it would keep the chilling atmosphere of the first movie. Los Angeles isn't going to keep the same tone. Glad their doing this though, the first was one of my favorite movies last year.
Posted by: alaskan guy on November 5, 2008 at 19:44:21
30 days of night... really? not in alaska, more like 14 days of night.
also, pipeline isnt going through barrow.. so hopefully the 2nd will be little more accurate.
OBAMA RULES!!! DOWN WITH PALIN!!!
(Ted Stevens is a crook) !!!!!
Posted by: 80Pork on November 5, 2008 at 22:56:01
Excellent! Great comic series and sounds like they are continuing with the same storyline for the movies. Looking forward to it.
Posted by: Captain Arlong on November 6, 2008 at 00:45:54
Ugh.. The vampires in that movie were so poorly done. I couldn't stop laughing when they were sitting around like a pack of dogs eating people.
Posted by: ico on November 6, 2008 at 01:37:27
I found the first one to be too slow.
Posted by: weinerface on November 6, 2008 at 02:53:37
30 days of night was ****ing laughable. The vampires looked retarded. Josh Hartnet WAS retarded. Was it really necessary to have have him say "we have to move" 4 or 5 times? SUCKED! AWFUL! everything in that movie was done better in another movie.
Guy turns into vampire and fights vampires? LOSTBOYS
Vampire we (are supposed to) care about burns up at dawn?
BLADE II
**** this movie and the ****ty acting that will surely follow in the sequel.
Posted by: weinerface on November 6, 2008 at 02:54:44
ps scariest thing was a snowplow
Posted by: Bebe on November 8, 2008 at 18:34:10
Forget it - if Josh Hartnett isn't going to be in it!
Posted by: brandon on April 25, 2009 at 09:52:51
i just hope everybody come back for it, and that if the principle cast return, then the ****ing, dumb**** produceers -- sam rami can be a bit of a dumb**** too... at times -- do not make a straight-to-dvd sequel, otherwise, I'll stick to the books and increase my hatred for hollywood and hope that their wearing flacjackets cos I'll be bringing a shotgun to them, and i want a fight when I get there
Posted by: brandon on April 25, 2009 at 09:56:36
weinerface, **** you! the books were around before Blade 2! get into the ****ing know about these things
1
Add a comment